You are currently viewing ‎US Court Takes Action On Tinubu Over Alleged Drug Trafficking: Tinubu Joins US Justice Department’s Request For 10-day Delay in Release of Records

‎US Court Takes Action On Tinubu Over Alleged Drug Trafficking: Tinubu Joins US Justice Department’s Request For 10-day Delay in Release of Records

‎President Bola Tinubu has joined the U.S. Department of Justice’s request for a 10-day extension to respond to a motion seeking the release of records relating to allegations of drug trafficking, DECENCY GLOBAL NEWS reports.

‎Tinubu’s legal team filed a notice of joinder before the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, asking to be placed on the same schedule as the defendants in the case.

‎The filing was published online by Von Batten-Montague-York, L.C., a U.S.-based policy advisory and lobbying firm retained by former Vice President Atiku Abubakar.

‎In the notice, Tinubu’s lawyers said they were joining the defendants’ motion for a 10-day extension to file a response to the motion for summary judgment.

‎“Intervenor joins Defendants’ motion for a 10-day extension of time to file response to the motion for summary judgment (DE 92), inasmuch as Intervenor requests that the responses remain on the same schedule,” the filing stated.

‎The notice was signed by Christopher W. Carmichael and Victor P. Henderson of Henderson Parks, LLC.

‎According to the filing, the plaintiff opposed the extension request, while the defendant did not.

‎However, U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell subsequently denied the request for an extension, according to the lobbying firm.

‎In a post on X, Von Batten-Montague-York accused Tinubu of seeking to use the delay to exert political influence in Washington.

‎The firm alleged that Tinubu could use the additional time to lobby U.S. officials against the release of the records on the grounds that their disclosure could affect U.S.-Nigeria relations and his cooperation with the United States on security matters.

‎It also warned against what it described as attempts by U.S. government officials to interfere with the judicial or Freedom of Information Act process.

‎The case, Aaron Greenspan v. Executive Office for U.S. Attorneys, et al., Civil Action No. 23-1816 (BAH), has been pending for more than three years.

‎The records sought in the case relate to U.S. investigations and allegations concerning Tinubu and suspected drug-trafficking activities.

‎Previous reports have linked a $460,000 asset forfeiture involving Tinubu to a U.S. federal investigation into a Chicago-based heroin-trafficking network in the late 1980s and early 1990s.

‎Court records and affidavits from U.S. authorities have been cited in connection with the forfeiture proceedings.

‎In 1993, a U.S. District Court ordered the forfeiture of $460,000 held in an account in Tinubu’s name to the U.S. government. The order stated that the funds represented proceeds of narcotics trafficking or were involved in transactions violating money-laundering laws.

‎Tinubu has consistently denied wrongdoing and rejected allegations that he was involved in drug trafficking.

‎His lawyers have maintained that the forfeiture proceeding was an in rem civil action against the money rather than a criminal case against Tinubu.

‎They have also argued that he was never arrested, indicted, arraigned or convicted of a drug offence in the United States.


Leave a Comment